Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://lib.ndu.edu.ua/dspace/handle/123456789/681
Title: | Чернігівщина та Львівщина в контексті спільних ойконімних домінант |
Authors: | Котович, В. В. |
Keywords: | ойконім антропонім гідронім ономастика |
Issue Date: | 2017 |
Publisher: | Видавництво НДУ ім.М. В. Гоголя |
Abstract: | У статті розглянуто ойконіми теперішньої Чернігівської та Львівської областей, які засвідчують єдність українського ойконім-ного простору, починаючи від періоду Київської Русі. Проаналізовано ойконіми Буськ, Любеч, Любша, Львів, Оргощ, Сновськ, Удеч, Черни-хів, Чернігів та ін., що засвідчують визначальні ойконімні домінанти прадавніх Чернігівської та Галицької земель. З’ясовано, що людина-номінатор стоїть у центрі створених онімів, а назви заселених та іменованих нею об’єктів формують унікальний онімний простір, як правило, монолітний на всій етнічній території. |
Description: | In the article analyzes the oikonimes of the present Chernihiv and Lviv regions, which testify to the unity of the Ukrainian oikonimes space, starting from the period of Kievan Rus. The purpose of the article is defined – to consider oikonimes as linguocultural symbols with a large content of information about the socio-historical and cultural life of the autochthonous people on their land. It is noted that the linguocultural aspect of onomastic research involves studying the national-cultural background, which has its own names, shows the connection of the process of creation with the ethnic consciousness, national mentality and culture, as a rule, monolithic throughout the ethnic territory. Analyzed by oikonimts Buzhsk, Lyubech, Lyubsha, Lviv, Orhosh, Snovsk, Udech, Chernykhiv, Chernigiv and others, as evidenced by the definitive oiconimes dominant of the ancient Chernihiv and Halych lands. It was found out that the person-nominator is in the center of the created onimes, and the names of the inhabited and named objects form a unique onimes space. It has been proved that the analysis of anthroponymes, which became the basis for the names of settlements, has a special place within the linguocultural perspective. Anthroponymes are some of the most cultured language signs, and hence the anthroponymes system of any language is a fundamental material for the knowledge and disclosure of the consciousness of the people, for understanding national psychology, even the regional character of a person. Examined by oikonimes within the three models: the possessive formations on -*jь, derivates on -*ovъ, from hydrоnymes oikonimes with suffix -*ьskъ. Summed up, the same oikonimes models speak about the uniform principles of nomination of settlements; ancient slavic names, the components of which are read in the foundations of the oikonimes, testify to the spiritual and cultural unity of those whose names served as the motive for the nomination of settlements. |
URI: | http://lib.ndu.edu.ua/dspace/handle/123456789/681 |
Appears in Collections: | Література та культура Полісся. Випуск 89 (2017 р.) |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.